Welcome to GameHourz.com!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

No more 22nd?

 
Goto page 1, 2
   Game Forums (Home) -> GameCube RSS
Next:  Jimmery?  
Author Message
Fred Liken

External


Since: Oct 08, 2004
Posts: 521



(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:29 pm
Post subject: No more 22nd?
Archived from groups: alt>games>video>nintendo>gamecube, others (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Bill Cable

External


Since: Jun 02, 2005
Posts: 63



(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:00 am
Post subject: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

This thing was only introduced. It won't even get out of the Judiciary
Committee, much less get passed into law. You'd be amazed by the
idiotic things that get proposed.

--
Bill Cable - Steelers Fan & Star Wars Collector
http://CreatureCantina.com <----- funny!
cable.DeleteThis@creaturecantina.com

 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mattinglyfan

External


Since: Mar 23, 2005
Posts: 444



(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:22 am
Post subject: Re: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Robert P Holley" wrote in message

>
>
> Fred Liken wrote:
>> http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.24.IH:
>
> A bunch of democrats so desperate for the White House they want Bill
> Clinton to run again?
>
>

Well don't you think some Republicans are gonna jump on that bandwagon for
the sake of keeping Hillary out.
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Robert P Holley

External


Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 507



(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:57 am
Post subject: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Mattinglyfan (deez nuts) wrote:
> "Robert P Holley" wrote in message
>
> >
> >
> > Fred Liken wrote:
> >> http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.24.IH:
> >
> > A bunch of democrats so desperate for the White House they want Bill
> > Clinton to run again?
> >
> >
>
> Well don't you think some Republicans are gonna jump on that bandwagon for
> the sake of keeping Hillary out.

Not at all.
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Xbot

External


Since: Jun 14, 2005
Posts: 18



(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:21 am
Post subject: Re: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Mattinglyfan" wrote in message

>
> "Robert P Holley" wrote in message
>
>>
>>
>> Fred Liken wrote:
>>> http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.24.IH:
>>
>> A bunch of democrats so desperate for the White House they want Bill
>> Clinton to run again?
>>
>
> Well don't you think some Republicans are gonna jump on that bandwagon for
> the sake of keeping Hillary out.

Republicans would welcome a Hillary nomination. Even Quayle'd beat her in a
landslide.
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
El Guapo

External


Since: May 06, 2004
Posts: 199



(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 6:48 am
Post subject: Re: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Mattinglyfan" wrote in message

>
> "Robert P Holley" wrote in message
>
>>
>>
>> Fred Liken wrote:
>>> http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.24.IH:
>>
>> A bunch of democrats so desperate for the White House they want Bill
>> Clinton to run again?
>>
>>
>
> Well don't you think some Republicans are gonna jump on that bandwagon for
> the sake of keeping Hillary out.

I would hope not - that would be a very un-Republican thing to do.
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jordan

External


Since: Mar 28, 2005
Posts: 1872



(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:57 am
Post subject: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

It's way too hard to get an amendment passed for this to just blow
through.

Check the constitution, there are two ways to add a new amendment...

First it has to pass by a 2/3rds majority in the House and Senate then
it's turned over to the states. 3/4 of the states have to vote for it.
That means 38/50.

Alternatively 2/3rds of the state legislatures could call for a
Constitutional Convention and re-do as much of the Constitution as
they'd like, but it would still be subject to a vote of 3/4 of the
states (plus such a move would be unprecedented, nobody knows how to do
it or what the ramifications would be.)

In short, the founding fathers made it hard to screw with the
constitution intentionally. It shouldn't be modified willy nilly (flag
burning), for a specific person (Bush, Clinton or Schwartzenegger), or
based on popular social morality of the time (18th amendment).

- Jordan
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Fred Liken

External


Since: Oct 08, 2004
Posts: 521



(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Mattinglyfan" wrote in message

>
> "Robert P Holley" wrote in message
>
>>
>>
>> Fred Liken wrote:
>>> http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.24.IH:
>>
>> A bunch of democrats so desperate for the White House they want Bill
>> Clinton to run again?
>
> Well don't you think some Republicans are gonna jump on that bandwagon for
> the sake of keeping Hillary out.

There's another election before this would ever be ratified, so what are you
trying to say? You must be confused.
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Fred Liken

External


Since: Oct 08, 2004
Posts: 521



(Msg. 9) Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:48 pm
Post subject: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Jordan" wrote in message

> It's way too hard to get an amendment passed for this to just blow
> through.
>
> Check the constitution, there are two ways to add a new amendment...
>
> First it has to pass by a 2/3rds majority in the House and Senate then
> it's turned over to the states. 3/4 of the states have to vote for it.
> That means 38/50.
>
> Alternatively 2/3rds of the state legislatures could call for a
> Constitutional Convention and re-do as much of the Constitution as
> they'd like, but it would still be subject to a vote of 3/4 of the
> states (plus such a move would be unprecedented, nobody knows how to do
> it or what the ramifications would be.)

States can decide how it's voted for, though. It doesn't necessariliy mean
a popular vote, no?

> In short, the founding fathers made it hard to screw with the
> constitution intentionally. It shouldn't be modified willy nilly (flag
> burning), for a specific person (Bush, Clinton or Schwartzenegger), or
> based on popular social morality of the time (18th amendment).

Shouldn't? That's tough to say.
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Miles Bader

External


Since: May 01, 2004
Posts: 151



(Msg. 10) Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Xbot" writes:
> Republicans would welcome a Hillary nomination. Even Quayle'd beat her in a
> landslide.

Not clear. Despite Republicans' bizarre primitive fear of her, surely
you've noticed the constant stream of news stories on how she's been
winning over many of them simply by working hard and being honest and
straight-forward?

-Miles
--
`Cars give people wonderful freedom and increase their opportunities.
But they also destroy the environment, to an extent so drastic that
they kill all social life' (from _A Pattern Language_)
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Xbot

External


Since: Jun 14, 2005
Posts: 18



(Msg. 11) Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Miles Bader" wrote in message

> "Xbot" writes:
>> Republicans would welcome a Hillary nomination. Even Quayle'd beat her in
>> a
>> landslide.
>
> Not clear. Despite Republicans' bizarre primitive fear of her, surely
> you've noticed the constant stream of news stories on how she's been
> winning over many of them simply by working hard and being honest and
> straight-forward?

A "constant stream of news stories" written by the liberal media. Sorry, I
don't buy into the latest talking points media onslaught, particularly when
it deals with as fictitious a subject as an "honest and straightforward"
Hillary Rodham Clinton. Hard-working I'll give her, but for all the wrong
reasons.
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Fred Liken

External


Since: Oct 08, 2004
Posts: 521



(Msg. 12) Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:30 pm
Post subject: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Miles Bader" wrote in message

> "Xbot" writes:
>> Republicans would welcome a Hillary nomination. Even Quayle'd beat her in
>> a
>> landslide.
>
> Not clear. Despite Republicans' bizarre primitive fear of her, surely
> you've noticed the constant stream of news stories on how she's been
> winning over many of them simply by working hard and being honest and
> straight-forward?

Hmmmm... not too hard when you lock out the media from your appearances when
they wouldn't be flattering.

Free press?
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jordan

External


Since: Mar 28, 2005
Posts: 1872



(Msg. 13) Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:50 pm
Post subject: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

States can decide how it's voted for, though. It doesn't necessariliy
mean
a popular vote, no?

This is true and in fact I'd expect it to not be a popular vote. The
founding fathers weren't big on popular votes, that's why we have the
representative system and electoral college.

- Jordan
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Doug Jacobs

External


Since: Nov 01, 2004
Posts: 2659



(Msg. 14) Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:16 am
Post subject: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Miles Bader wrote:

> Not clear. Despite Republicans' bizarre primitive fear of her, surely
> you've noticed the constant stream of news stories on how she's been
> winning over many of them simply by working hard and being honest and
> straight-forward?

A politician who works hard, is honest, and is straight-forward?

No wonder the Republicans fear her so much... :p
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Fred Liken

External


Since: Oct 08, 2004
Posts: 521



(Msg. 15) Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:16 am
Post subject: Re: No more 22nd? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Doug Jacobs" wrote in message

> In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Miles Bader wrote:
>
>> Not clear. Despite Republicans' bizarre primitive fear of her, surely
>> you've noticed the constant stream of news stories on how she's been
>> winning over many of them simply by working hard and being honest and
>> straight-forward?
>
> A politician who works hard, is honest, and is straight-forward?
>
> No wonder the Republicans fear her so much... :p

See, typical BS from Doug that he'll spout but when it's pointed out that
he's wrong, he yells TROLL!

Oh well.
 >> Stay informed about: No more 22nd? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Help needed for Tales of Symphonia - I need help to find that one skeleton guy with the swords, I've faced him and defeated him once but I heard that you can face him a total of 3 times, but I can't find out where he is now.

I Will Buy a Revolution If It Can Play.. - ...accurate versions of at least 2 out of three of the following: 1) Mike Tyson's Punch-Out (NES) 2) Super Tecmo Bowl (NES) 3) Blades of Steel (NES) Super Punch-Out (SNES) would be nice too. Can anyone confirm or make an educated guess to the..

Skies Of Arcadia Legends - I am near the end of the game, and trying to finish all the sidequests. Right now my rating is Vyse, the Fallen Pirate. I understand that I need to fight some imposters in Nasrad. But I can't seem to make them appear. Anyone have any suggestions?

GameCube RPG since Fire Emblem - Does anyone know if any turn-based strategy RPGs have come out for the cube since Fire Emblem? Thanx AMO

Hulk Game Graphics question - we rented the hulk game and noticed that the graphics were quite different from other games. all the vehicles are transparent when he throws them. compare this to the sonic games where all the graphics are solid and clean. is it because the hulk games,...
   Game Forums (Home) -> GameCube All times are: Ekaterinburg, Islamabad, Karachi, Tashkent
Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]